Skilled Bimanual Training Drives Motor Cortex Plasticity in Children With Unilateral Cerebral Palsy.
Kathleen M Friel, Hsing-Ching Kuo, Jason Fuller and 12 others
PMID 26867559WHAT IT FOUND
In children with unilateral cerebral palsy, 90 hours of structured bimanual skill training enlarged hand movement areas in the brain and strengthened muscle responses to brain stimulation.
Unstructured play did not. Both groups improved hand function similarly.
Key findings
01Structured skill training increased affected-hand motor map size by 23.3% after training and by 34.9% at six months; unstructured practice did not show this increase.
02Structured skill training increased muscle responses to brain stimulation from before training to six months by 19% for the first dorsal interosseous muscle and by 78.1% for the flexor carpi radialis muscle; unstructured practice did not show these increases.
03Both groups improved hand function: bimanual use improved by 1.9 units but not by a clinically meaningful amount, unimanual task time improved by 17% in a clinically meaningful way, and both groups improved equally well.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTsWhat it means for OTs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
Only a small number of children were studied, so the results may not generalise. The paper reports 18 randomized children but also describes two groups of 10, so the analysed sample is unclear. One six-month follow-up was missing and was replaced with the group average. The study measured only motor cortex maps, so changes in other brain or spinal regions were not assessed. The clinical tests did not measure movement quality, so differences in how children moved may have been missed. The study used a high therapy dose, and the authors suggest this may have reduced differences between groups. The structured group received task progression, isolated movement practice, and functional goals together, so the contribution of any single component cannot be separated.
The easy way to misread this
Do not conclude that structured training gives better hand function. Both groups improved hand function similarly, and the structured group received task progression, isolated movement practice, and functional goals together, so their separate contributions cannot be separated.