PTOTSurveyOTJR : occupation, participation and health2026

Pediatric Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy: Current Practices and Implementation Barriers.

Sophia C Larson, Alyssa E Smith, Bhooma R Aravamuthan and 4 others

PMID 39659237

WHAT IT FOUND

75% of surveyed US paediatric providers said pCIMT was available in their region, but only 14% said every eligible child could actually get it.

Cost, therapist and family availability were the top reported barriers, and academic programmes spend 0 to 1 hour on it.

Key findings

01Most respondents said pCIMT was available where they worked (111 of 148, 75%), but only 20 of 148 (14%) said it was accessible to all eligible children, so programmes exist that children cannot get into.

02The barriers most often reported to expanding pCIMT were therapist availability, cost, family availability and institutional limitations, with reimbursement, funding, scheduling and staffing raised separately.

03Among the 73 respondents who taught future rehabilitation professionals, the average time given to pCIMT principles was 0 to 1 hour, and only 9 of 73 (12%) offered learners hands-on practice.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTsWhat it means for OTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

Only 148 people completed the survey, a 7.6% response rate, and the authors say those already familiar with pCIMT were the most likely to answer, so awareness and availability are probably overstated. The researchers could not compare the people who replied with those who did not, so it is unclear how representative these views are. Everything reported is what providers said, not what was observed in clinics. Socioeconomic disadvantage was estimated from the institution's ZIP code, which may not reflect the circumstances of the children actually travelling in for care. Caregivers were not surveyed, and the authors say family-level barriers such as cost, transport and knowledge would likely remain even if pCIMT were widely available. Clinical and academic respondents were pooled, so the study cannot separate the two perspectives.

Declared interests

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship and publication of the article.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read these figures as a nationwide picture of pCIMT. Only 148 providers completed the survey, a 7.6% response rate, and the authors say those already familiar with pCIMT were the most likely to answer, so awareness and availability are probably overstated. The survey asked what people believe, so it says nothing about whether pCIMT works.

Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →