Evaluation of sensory processing abilities following stroke using the adolescent/adult sensory profile: implications for individualized intervention.
Sang Mi Chung, Bo Kyoung Song
PMID 27821949WHAT IT FOUND
Stroke survivors mostly resembled healthy adults on sensory processing.
They differed in low registration, sensation seeking, and sensation avoiding, not in sensory sensitivity. The profile describes patterns, not treatment effects.
Key findings
01Stroke patients averaged 32.1 on low registration, 34.3 on sensation seeking, 36.7 on sensory sensitivity, and 34.0 on sensation avoiding, each scored out of 75.
02Compared with healthy controls, stroke patients differed in low registration, sensation seeking, and sensation avoiding, but not in sensory sensitivity.
03Most patients scored in the similar-to-most-people range: 65% low registration, 77.2% sensation seeking, 65% sensory sensitivity, and 62.2% sensation avoiding.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTsWhat it means for OTs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
The study did not test an intervention, so it cannot show that sensory processing patterns cause disability or that changing the environment improves outcomes. The participant counts are inconsistent: 240 patients consented, 480 questionnaires were collected, and 180 were analysed. Only patients with Modified Barthel Index scores above 75 and Korean Mental State Examination scores above 20 were included, so the findings do not apply to more disabled or cognitively impaired stroke survivors. The comparison group was healthy Korean adults from previous studies, not a concurrent control group, so differences may reflect sampling or measurement differences. Questionnaires were sometimes read with help from protectors or therapists, which may affect responses. The design was a single-time questionnaire study, so it describes patterns rather than change after treatment.
Declared interests
No conflicts of interest or funding statement appears in the supplied text.
The easy way to misread this
Do not read the differences from healthy controls as proof that a sensory-based intervention works. The study measured questionnaire patterns and did not test treatment.