PTOTOtherJournal of physical therapy science2017

Effects of gross motor function and manual function levels on performance-based ADL motor skills of children with spastic cerebral palsy.

Myoung-Ok Park

PMID 28265171

WHAT IT FOUND

Children with mild to moderate spastic cerebral palsy classified at GMFCS or MACS Level III had lower ADL motor skill scores on real tasks than Level I children, especially during dressing, shoe donning, and cereal preparation.

Key findings

01ADL motor skill scores differed significantly among GMFCS and MACS levels.

02Compared with GMFCS Level I, GMFCS Level III was 39.0 points lower on ADL motor skill, and the model explained 47.6%.

03Compared with MACS Level I, MACS Level II and Level III were 20.98 and 32.58 points lower on ADL motor skill, and the model explained 30.6%.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTsWhat it means for OTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

Only 23 children were studied, all with mild to moderate spastic cerebral palsy and GMFCS or MACS Levels I to III, so results cannot be applied to severe levels or other cerebral palsy types. Children with mixed diagnoses such as severe visual or auditory problems or intellectual disability were excluded, so the sample may not represent typical clinical caseloads. The study analysed only ADL motor skills, not ADL process skills, so it does not address cognitive or organisational aspects of daily performance. The MACS regression significance labels are inconsistent between the text and the table, so the exact significance of MACS Level II and III coefficients should be read cautiously. The paper reports a hospital sample and does not describe blinding or a longitudinal design.

The easy way to misread this

Do not use these results to predict ADL motor skills for children with severe or non-spastic cerebral palsy; the study included only 23 children with mild to moderate spastic cerebral palsy at GMFCS or MACS Levels I to III.

Read it on PubMed →