Transition From Children's to Adults' Healthcare for Youth With (Genetic) Intellectual Disabilities: An ERN-ITHACA Guideline.
Mirthe J Klein Haneveld, Katarzyna Świeczkowska, Tomasz Grybek and 19 others
PMID 41115693WHAT IT FOUND
Transition planning for young people with intellectual disabilities should start at 13 or 14 years and use a named worker to coordinate care.
These are expert recommendations, not evidence that they work.
Key findings
01Transition planning should start at 13 to 14 years and the transfer point should not be set by a rigid age threshold.
02A named worker should coordinate transition care and support, and the guideline says an allied health professional may fill that role.
03The evidence base is described as very low grade and mostly descriptive, and research evaluating transition interventions is scarce.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTsWhat it means for OTsWhat it means for SLPs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
This is a guideline, not a trial. It reports no patient outcomes and does not show that the recommended transition steps improve health, participation or independence. The authors say all available literature was very low grade and mostly exploratory or descriptive, and no GRADE analysis was done. Research evaluating transition interventions for young people with intellectual disabilities is scarce, and some interventions may not be suitable or easy to implement. The survey had 157 caregivers but limited response from young people, so young people's views may be underrepresented. The target population is broad, from rare genetic conditions to profound intellectual and multiple disabilities, and the authors note large variation in European health systems and resources. The literature search ended in July 2022, and the guideline will be revisited after 5 years.
Declared interests
The guideline was funded by the European Reference Network on Rare Congenital Malformations and Rare Intellectual Disability and the EU4Health programme of the European Union. Some authors received research support from grants unrelated to this publication, and some report consultancy in rare disease areas. The remaining authors declared no conflicts.
The easy way to misread this
Do not read the named worker and early planning recommendations as proven ways to improve outcomes. The guideline is based on expert consensus and a literature base the authors describe as very low grade, and the authors say research evaluating transition interventions is scarce.
Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →