The Effects of Resistance Training on Physical Fitness and Neuromotor-Cognitive Functions in Adults With Down Syndrome.
Emily M Post, William J Kraemer, Madison L Kackley and 7 others
PMID 36189007WHAT IT FOUND
Eleven adults with Down syndrome completed a 10-week resistance training program.
They improved strength, motor skills, working memory, and mood. No control group means these gains cannot be proven to come from the exercise rather than time or testing effects.
Key findings
01Participants significantly improved locomotor skill, object control skill, and total gross motor function after the intervention.
02The program significantly improved sit-and-reach flexibility, bench press and leg press strength, push-ups, sit-ups, and chair sit-to-stand performance.
03Mood disturbances decreased significantly, with trait mood improving by 48.8%.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTsWhat it means for OTsWhat it means for SLPs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
No control group was used, so improvements cannot be definitively attributed to the resistance training rather than natural development, testing effects, or other factors. The sample size was very small (n=11), limiting the generalizability of the findings. The intervention was highly supervised and individualized, which may not be feasible in typical community settings. Some cognitive outcomes showed non-significant changes or mixed results, and the primary outcome designation was not explicitly defined in the text beyond a general statement of 'primary findings'.
Declared interests
The study was supported by a doctoral student grant from the National Strength and Conditioning Association and Ohio State University funds. The authors declared no commercial or financial conflicts of interest.
The easy way to misread this
Do not assume this proves resistance training causes these improvements. The study had no control group, so the gains could be due to practice effects, maturation, or other unmeasured variables. The small sample size (n=11) makes the results preliminary at best.