The 'Bounce Back' rehabilitation programme for stroke survivors in South Africa - a case report.
Laeeqa Sujee, Sacha Hildebrandt, Amy Harrison and 5 others
PMID 40061853WHAT IT FOUND
Stroke survivors in a South African community programme gained functional independence and reported fewer problems, but depression outcomes varied.
Some improved, while another worsened. This is a case series, not proof the programme caused change.
Key findings
01All participants had higher functional independence scores at discharge than at baseline.
02All participants had lower health-related quality of life scores at discharge than at baseline, meaning fewer reported problems.
03Depressive symptoms did not follow the same pattern: only one participant had a clinically significant reduction, and another participant's score increased to the clinically significant range.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTsWhat it means for OTsWhat it means for SLPs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
Only five stroke survivors were reported, so this describes what happened to a few people, not a treatment effect. This was a case series with no comparison group, so the report cannot show whether the changes differed from what would have happened without the programme. The programme included physiotherapy, occupational therapy, speech therapy, social work and medical care, so the contribution of any single component cannot be separated. Return-to-work goals were mostly not achieved, so the report does not show employment outcomes. Depressive symptoms did not improve in the same way as function and quality of life, and one participant worsened. Participants were selected because they could not access intensive rehabilitation in the public or private sectors, so results may not apply to people who can access intensive services.
Declared interests
This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors. The programme was implemented at no cost to stroke survivors and was funded through the non-profit Phila Sonke Wellness Initiative.
The easy way to misread this
Do not conclude that the Bounce Back programme caused the functional gains or quality-of-life improvements. This was a case series with no comparison group and an interdisciplinary programme, so the report cannot show that any single component caused the changes.