PTOTNarrative ReviewJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2022

Soft robotics and functional electrical stimulation advances for restoring hand function in people with SCI: a narrative review, clinical guidelines and future directions.

Lucas R L Cardoso, Vanesa Bochkezanian, Arturo Forner-Cordero and 2 others

PMID 35773733

WHAT IT FOUND

Soft robotic gloves and functional electrical stimulation show promise for hand recovery in spinal cord injury, but most devices remain experimental prototypes with limited clinical validation.

Clinicians should view these technologies as emerging aids rather than established treatments.

Key findings

01The review included 37 studies, but 18 of them came from just five research groups, indicating a narrow evidence base.

02Most devices are still research prototypes or experimental setups, meaning they lack the robustness and standardization needed for routine clinical prescription.

03There is no consensus on how to measure hand function in these studies, with many using non-standardized tests or failing to report statistical significance.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTsWhat it means for OTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The review is narrative, not systematic, so it may not have captured all relevant studies. Most included studies had very small sample sizes, often single cases or small pilots, limiting generalizability. A significant portion of the evidence comes from only five research groups, suggesting potential bias or lack of independent replication. Many studies did not report statistical analyses or used non-standardized outcome measures, making it difficult to determine if improvements were clinically meaningful. Most devices are research prototypes or modified commercial systems, meaning they are not currently available for standard clinical prescription.

The easy way to misread this

Do not interpret the reported improvements in hand function as evidence that these devices are effective clinical treatments. Most studies were small, uncontrolled pilots or case reports with significant methodological limitations, and the devices themselves are largely experimental prototypes not yet ready for routine use.

Read it on PubMed →