OTOtherHong Kong journal of occupational therapy : HKJOT2016

Reliability and Validity of the Activity Participation Assessment for School-age Children in Korea.

Se-Yun Kim, Eun-Young Yoo, Min-Ye Jung and 3 others

PMID 30186065

WHAT IT FOUND

A 38-item Korean questionnaire about how often school-age children do home, school, social, sport, and self-care tasks was stable over 2 weeks.

Parents reported lower participation for children with intellectual disability than for nondisabled children. It may guide OT conversations, not prove treatment benefit.

Key findings

01The final APA kept 38 activity items across five domains: instrumental activities of daily living, sports and outdoor activities, hobbies and school activities, social activities, and personal care.

02In 22 nondisabled children, scores were stable over 2 weeks, with reliability values of .86 to .92, which the paper treats as good to excellent.

03In parent-reported comparisons of 56 nondisabled children and 56 children with intellectual disability, nondisabled children had significantly higher participation scores in all five domains.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for OTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The authors say the factor analysis was preliminary and the small sample size limits generalisation. The final 38-item tool removed 45 items, including culturally relevant Korean activities, because they had low factor loadings. The study did not assess inter-rater reliability or concurrent validity with other participation tools. For children with intellectual disability, parents completed the questionnaire, so the child's own perspective was not measured. The test-retest reliability was based on 22 nondisabled children. The paper describes development for Korean school-age children and does not report validation outside Korea.

The easy way to misread this

Do not conclude that the APA improves participation or that it is ready as a standard outcome measure for all children. It is a preliminary questionnaire for Korean school-age children, and culturally relevant activities were removed during factor analysis.

Read it on PubMed →


The study

Participants
134 nondisabled children for construct validity and internal consistency; 22 nondisabled children for test-retest; 56 nondisabled children and 56 children with intellectual disability for discriminant validity; 414 nondisabled children in the earlier item-selection survey
Certainty of evidence
Low

Related papers

Browse

Cite

Se-Yun Kim, Eun-Young Yoo, Min-Ye Jung, et al. Reliability and Validity of the Activity Participation Assessment for School-age Children in Korea. Hong Kong journal of occupational therapy : HKJOT. 2016.

Read the original

Reliability and Validity of the Activity Participation Assessment for School-age Children in Korea. — Applied Evidence