PTOTQualitativeJMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies2021

Parents' Perspectives on a Computer Game-Assisted Rehabilitation Program for Manual Dexterity in Children With Cerebral Palsy: Qualitative Analysis of Expectations, Child Engagement, and Benefits.

Anuprita Kanitkar, Sanjay Tejraj Parmar, Tony J Szturm and 3 others

PMID 34057424

WHAT IT FOUND

Parents found game-assisted hand therapy more engaging than conventional therapy for children with cerebral palsy, noting improved dexterity and interest.

They requested more frequent updates to maintain challenge and expressed interest in home-based use.

Key findings

01Parents in the game-assisted group reported their children were easier to engage and found the exercises fun compared to conventional therapy.

02Parents perceived improvements in manual dexterity, hand-eye coordination, and daily activities in the game-assisted group, though these were subjective reports.

03A key challenge was the four-week interval between protocol updates, which led to children losing interest in specific games.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTsWhat it means for OTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The study did not obtain direct views from the children, relying solely on parental perception. The number of interviewed parents differed significantly between groups (24 vs 14), which may bias the comparison of experiences. Perceived improvements were subjective and not verified by clinical outcomes in this paper. The context was specific to families in India with limited prior access to computers, which may not generalize to other settings.

Declared interests

None declared.

The easy way to misread this

Do not interpret the parents' perceived improvements in dexterity as evidence of clinical efficacy. This paper reports qualitative experiences only; the quantitative outcomes comparing the two therapies were not included here.

Read it on PubMed →