PTOTSLPCohortDevelopmental medicine and child neurology2026

Ophthalmological outcomes, visual perception, fine motor precision, and visual-motor integration in children born very preterm.

Martin Johansson, Eva Larsson, Gerd Holmström and 3 others

PMID 41578678

WHAT IT FOUND

Children born very preterm showed poorer visual-motor integration, visual perception, and fine motor precision at age 12 compared to term-born peers.

These deficits persisted despite best-corrected vision, linking early ophthalmological issues to long-term functional outcomes.

Key findings

01Children born very preterm had significantly lower visual-motor integration scores at 12 years compared to controls, with performance deteriorating relative to normative data.

02Ophthalmological outcomes at 6 years 6 months, including visual acuity and stereopsis, were associated with visual-motor integration and fine motor precision at 12 years in the preterm group.

03Severe brain injury and retinopathy of prematurity stage 3 or greater were significant predictors of poorer visual-motor integration scores at 12 years.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTsWhat it means for OTsWhat it means for SLPs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The sample size at 12 years was relatively small (59 preterm, 46 controls), limiting statistical power for subgroup analyses. A priori sample size calculation was not performed. Dropout rates were significant (54% follow-up for ophthalmological exams), and children with IVH were less likely to participate, potentially biasing results against finding effects of brain injury. Neonatal brain injury was assessed via ultrasound, which may miss subtle injuries. Diagnoses of cerebral visual impairment, intellectual disability, and cerebral palsy were made clinically outside the study protocol, introducing potential variability. The study did not include a formal assessment of general intelligence, which explains approximately 25% of VMI variance.

Declared interests

The study was funded by several Swedish foundations and research councils (Ögonfonden, Stiftelsen Kronprinsessan Margaretas Arbetsnämnd för Synskadade, Linnéa och Josef Carlssons Stiftelse, Synskadades Vänner i Uppsala, Stiftelsen Promobilia, Vetenskapsrådet). No commercial conflicts of interest were declared.

The easy way to misread this

Do not assume that visual-motor integration deficits in children born very preterm are solely due to cerebral visual impairment or intellectual disability. The study found that ophthalmological factors like visual acuity and stereopsis, even without these diagnoses, were significant predictors of VMI performance. Screening and treating refractive errors and strabismus may improve functional outcomes.

Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →