Online Family Problem-Solving Therapy (F-PST) for Executive and Behavioral Dysfunction After Traumatic Brain Injury in Adolescents: A Randomized, Multicenter, Comparative Effectiveness Clinical Trial.
Brad G Kurowski, H Gerry Taylor, Kelly A McNally and 5 others
PMID 31834062WHAT IT FOUND
The three family problem-solving modes did not differ on parent- and adolescent-reported executive function and behavior scores.
Parent-reported scores improved within online groups, especially self-guided online at 9 months.
Key findings
01The treatment groups did not differ on parent- or self-report executive function or behavior scores.
02Parent-reported behavior regulation improved from baseline to 6 months in the therapist-guided and self-guided online groups, and further at 9 months in the self-guided online group.
03The self-guided online group improved on parent-reported total, externalizing, and internalizing behavior scores from baseline to 9 months.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for OTs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
The face-to-face group was smaller than the online groups because randomization depended on distance, which may have limited power to detect differences involving face-to-face treatment. The study was powered for the comparison of the two online groups, not for all three delivery modes. Parents and adolescents knew which treatment they received, so their ratings could have been influenced by expectations or preference. The behavior rating scale was chosen to be brief and may have been less sensitive to change than scales used in earlier problem-solving therapy studies. Follow-up was limited to 9 months, so longer-term effects were not tested. The study included few families from rural areas, so it could not test whether urban versus rural residence changed treatment effects. Treatment sessions were not recorded and coded for fidelity, so details of how consistently the therapy was delivered were limited. A lower proportion of white participants was in the face-to-face group than in the online groups, so the groups were not identical on race.
Declared interests
The authors disclosed no potential conflicts of interest.
The easy way to misread this
Do not conclude that self-guided online therapy is proven better than face-to-face therapy. The primary comparison among treatment groups found no differences, and the positive self-guided findings were secondary or within-group. The face-to-face group was smaller, and participants were not blinded.