OTRNQualitativeJournal of advanced nursing2026

Older Adults' Self-Care and Family Caregiver Contribution in Multiple Chronic Conditions: A Dyadic Qualitative Study.

Giulia Andrea Baldan, Irene Dello Iacono, Valentina Giurissevich and 4 others

PMID 41046449

WHAT IT FOUND

In 34 older adult and family caregiver dyads managing multiple chronic conditions, older adults prioritised symptoms that limited daily life, while caregivers prioritised diseases with complications.

Self-care roles and decisions often differed.

Key findings

01Older adults tended to prioritise conditions causing the most debilitating symptoms, limited mobility and autonomy, or pain, while caregivers focused on diseases that could lead to serious complications.

02Dyads could disagree about who made health decisions: older adults sometimes reported autonomous decision-making while caregivers described shared or caregiver-led decision-making.

03Disease care was organised in three patterns: collaborative, older adult-directed, and caregiver-directed, with caregivers sometimes taking medication, diet, appointment, hygiene, and coordination tasks.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for OTsWhat it means for RNs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The older adults were in a stable phase of chronic conditions, so findings may not apply to younger people or those with acute or rapidly changing illness. The study was done in Italy, where the healthcare system and familistic caregiving culture may shape dyadic arrangements differently from other countries. The same research assistant interviewed both members of each dyad on the same day, which could introduce interviewer bias despite an interview guide and instructions not to share information. Three different research assistants conducted interviews, and different interviewers may elicit different responses. Some interviews were short, with a mean duration of 17 minutes, which may have limited depth of individual responses. No member checking was done, so participants did not review the analysis. The study could not examine whether kinship roles or gender influenced management, and it cannot estimate how common the patterns are.

Declared interests

The authors declared no conflicts of interest. Funding came from the Centre of Excellence for Nursing Scholarship (CECRI).

The easy way to misread this

Do not read these themes as proof that assessing or mediating dyadic roles improves health outcomes. The study described experiences in 34 Italian dyads and did not test an intervention.

Read it on PubMed →