PTOTSLPSystematic ReviewMolecular autism2019

Neuropsychiatric decompensation in adolescents and adults with Phelan-McDermid syndrome: a systematic review of the literature.

Alexander Kolevzon, Elsa Delaby, Elizabeth Berry-Kravis and 2 others

PMID 31879555

WHAT IT FOUND

Adolescents and adults with Phelan-McDermid syndrome show a high risk of sudden neuropsychiatric decompensation, including bipolar disorder and catatonia.

Peak onset is between 16 and 20 years. Antipsychotics were often ineffective or poorly tolerated, while lithium and divalproex sodium showed more consistent benefit.

Key findings

01Neuropsychiatric decompensation and loss of skills in adolescence or adulthood appear to be common in Phelan-McDermid syndrome, with a peak onset between 16 and 20 years.

02Antipsychotics were generally ineffective and poorly tolerated in these patients, whereas lithium and divalproex sodium were associated with more consistent stabilization of mood and behavior.

03Catatonia is a frequent complication, occurring in 29% of the reviewed cases, and often requires treatment with benzodiazepines or electroconvulsive therapy rather than antipsychotics.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTsWhat it means for OTsWhat it means for SLPs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The review relies entirely on case reports, which are subject to ascertainment bias and may not represent the general PMS population. Descriptions of symptoms and skill loss were often retrospective and lacked standardized measures, making it difficult to confirm whether losses met the criteria for true regression or were temporary effects of acute psychiatric episodes. Diagnosis of psychiatric conditions like bipolar disorder and catatonia is challenging in individuals with severe intellectual disability and limited speech, and many reports lacked sufficient detail to reliably confirm these diagnoses. Treatment responses were not systematically assessed, and the small number of patients receiving specific medications limits the ability to draw firm conclusions about efficacy.

Declared interests

The study was funded by the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, the New York Community Trust Jules and Ethel Klein Fund, the Beatrice and Samuel A. Seaver Foundation, and the NIH Rare Disease Clinical Research Network. No specific conflicts of interest were declared by the authors in the provided text.

The easy way to misread this

Do not interpret the reported treatment successes as evidence of proven efficacy. The review highlights that antipsychotics were often ineffective or harmful, while lithium and divalproex showed promise, but these conclusions are based on uncontrolled case reports with significant variability in dosing and outcome measures. Clinical decisions should be made with caution and in consultation with specialists familiar with PMS.

Read it on PubMed →