PTOTSLPCohortJournal of developmental and behavioral pediatrics : JDBP2020

Neurodevelopmental Characterization of Young Children Diagnosed with Niemann-Pick Disease, Type C1.

Audrey Thurm, Colby Chlebowski, Lisa Joseph and 8 others

PMID 32073546

WHAT IT FOUND

22 of 29 young children with NPC1 had delays qualifying them for early intervention, yet only 10 received services before age 3.

Motor and language delays were common.

Key findings

0122 of 29 participants had referable delays, but only 10 were reported to receive early intervention before age 3.

02Motor Skills were a relative weakness, with only nine of 28 participants in the adequate range on the Vineland-II at baseline.

03Twelve of 29 children at least provisionally met diagnostic criteria for global developmental delay.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTsWhat it means for OTsWhat it means for SLPs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The analysis included only 29 children, so it is a small descriptive natural history study and cannot test whether early intervention improves outcomes. Only 22 of 29 children had at least part of a cognitive test, and missing cognitive data were due to time constraints or a language barrier. Six children met criteria for global developmental delay based on parent report alone, so some findings relied on caregiver interview rather than direct testing. Longitudinal data were limited: only seven participants were evaluated more than once. Two participants had liver transplants, and their motor delays may have had other causes. Service receipt was reported by families or records, not independently verified. There may be a cohort effect because children with liver or spleen involvement may have been diagnosed and enrolled earlier.

Declared interests

The authors reported no real or potential conflicts of interest. The paper is listed as supported by NIH intramural research.

The easy way to misread this

Do not conclude that early intervention improves NPC1 development from this paper. It reports developmental delays and service receipt in a small observational cohort, not treatment outcomes.

Read it on PubMed →