PTOTRCTDevelopmental medicine and child neurology2026

Modified sports intervention for improving participation goals and activity competence in ambulant children with cerebral palsy: A randomized controlled trial.

Ricardo R Sousa Junior, Georgina L Clutterbuck, Rafaela F Guimaraes and 5 others

PMID 40605736

WHAT IT FOUND

For ambulant children with cerebral palsy, an 8-week modified sports programme improved parent-set goals for attending and engaging in leisure physical activity more than usual physical therapy.

Motor performance goals also improved. However, the programme did not change overall physical activity levels, body functions, or general participation.

Key findings

01The sports intervention was more effective than usual physical therapy in improving goals related to leisure-time physical activity attendance and involvement immediately after the 8-week intervention.

02The sports intervention was more effective than usual physical therapy in improving goals related to motor performance, with effects sustained at the 12-week follow-up.

03The sports intervention was not effective in improving physical activity levels, body functions, and overall participation immediately after or 12 weeks after the intervention.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTsWhat it means for OTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The study was powered for the primary outcome but had low power (22%-64%) for some secondary outcomes like physical literacy and motor capacity tests. Data on the usual physical therapy control group relied on parent recall because therapists did not collaborate with data collection, potentially introducing bias regarding the content and adherence of usual care. Some participants had missing data at post-intervention and follow-up assessments, though there were no dropouts. The minimal clinically important difference for the COPM was not analysed because current evidence refutes standard MCID values for this measure. The study population was limited to children who could safely participate in physical activities and whose parents agreed to suspend usual therapy for the intervention group, which may limit generalizability to children with more complex needs.

Declared interests

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

The easy way to misread this

Do not assume that improved parent-set goals for participation translate to increased overall physical activity levels or improved body functions. The study found significant gains in specific COPM goals but no difference in accelerometer-measured activity or clinical measures of balance and strength.

Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →