PTOTSLPOtherJournal of developmental and behavioral pediatrics : JDBP2026

Maternal Responsiveness, Parenting Self-efficacy, and Economic Empowerment: Determinants of Infant Development in Pakistan.

Deepika Khanna, Marika Toscano, Soim Park and 5 others

PMID 41984574

WHAT IT FOUND

More responsive, more confident mothers had lower odds of their baby showing developmental delay at six weeks, in communication, problem solving and personal-social skills.

One check-up of 400 Pakistani mothers and babies, so it cannot show which came first.

Key findings

01Higher maternal responsiveness was linked to lower odds of delay in communication (40% lower), problem solving (36% lower) and personal-social skills (32% lower) for every 10-point rise on the responsiveness questionnaire.

02Higher parenting self-efficacy was linked to lower odds of delay in gross motor (30% lower), problem solving (45% lower) and personal-social skills (37% lower) for every 4-point rise on the self-efficacy scale.

03Economic empowerment changed the picture: among mothers who were not economically empowered, higher self-efficacy went with lower odds of fine motor and personal-social delay, while among empowered mothers that link was not found.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTsWhat it means for OTsWhat it means for SLPs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

Everyone was measured once, at six weeks after delivery, so the study can show links but cannot say what causes what. A single early time point says nothing about whether these differences persist into later childhood. Almost everything except the baby's measurements came from mothers' own reports, and what counts as a good answer may differ across cultures. The authors suggest this may be why these mothers rated their babies higher than US mothers do. All the women were pregnant women with at least mild anxiety attending one public hospital in urban Punjab, and women with depression or serious mental illness were excluded, so the results may not fit women without anxiety, women with depression, or rural families. Economic empowerment was measured with five questions about land, assets, savings and earnings, which the authors say oversimplifies a multidimensional idea. This is a secondary analysis of 400 of the 1200 women in the original trial, and the empowerment finding rests on two significant results out of ten interaction tests, so it could be chance. The researchers set their own cut-offs for 'abnormal' development from this sample rather than using published norms, so 'abnormal' here means below this group's own average, not below a standard population's.

Declared interests

The text supplied for this summary contains no funding statement and no conflict-of-interest declaration, so it is not possible to say who paid for the work or what the authors declared. The parent trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03880032).

The easy way to misread this

Do not take this as proof that making a mother more responsive or more confident will improve her baby's development. All the measurements were taken at one time point, so it is just as possible that a baby who is developing well makes a mother feel more responsive and more confident. The finding that confidence mattered only for women without economic empowerment came from two of ten interaction tests, so it may not hold up.

Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →

Maternal Responsiveness, Parenting Self-efficacy, and Economic Empowerment: Determinants of Infant Development in Pakistan. — Applied Evidence