PTOTSLPRNQualitativeRevista latino-americana de enfermagem2024

Guides or guidelines for interacting and playing with medical complex children: a qualitative documentary research.

Jéssica Renata Bastos Depianti, Thaís Guilherme Pereira Pimentel, Fernanda Borges Pessanha and 2 others

PMID 38985041

WHAT IT FOUND

Guides for children with medical complexity recommend play through the adult's voice, repeated simple interactions, high-contrast and textured objects, bath routines, and safe mobility.

These are care prompts, not proof that play improves outcomes.

Key findings

01Nine eligible guides were grouped into themes of sensory stimulation, adult-child interaction, and stimulation of potentialities.

02Adult-child interaction recommendations included calling the child by name, talking until a sound or gesture is returned, and repeating the same play.

03Sensory stimulation recommendations included high-contrast, sound-producing, textured objects placed closer to the child's sight, hearing, and touch.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTsWhat it means for OTsWhat it means for SLPsWhat it means for RNs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The study analyzed documents, not patients, so it does not show that these activities improve child outcomes. Many guides were for children with special health care needs generally, not specifically for children living with complex care. The search was limited to English and Portuguese materials found through an internet platform. The guides did not address racial, gender, or socioeconomic issues. The authors did not test the guides in clinical care.

Declared interests

Funded by Brazilian research agencies; no author conflicts are stated.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read these guide recommendations as evidence that play or sensory activities improve outcomes. The paper analyzed documents, not patients, and the activities were not tested for efficacy.

Read it on PubMed →