PTOTOtherFrontiers in rehabilitation sciences2022

Functional and Structural Brain Connectivity in Children With Bilateral Cerebral Palsy Compared to Age-Related Controls and in Response to Intensive Rapid-Reciprocal Leg Training.

Diane L Damiano, James J Pekar, Susumu Mori and 7 others

PMID 36189020

WHAT IT FOUND

Intensive leg training did not change brain structure or connectivity in children with bilateral cerebral palsy.

Training improved speed on the device but did not improve walking speed. Small sample size and motion artifacts limit confidence in these null findings.

Key findings

01There were no detectable differences in brain structure or functional connectivity after the training intervention.

02Training significantly improved cadence on the assigned device but did not transfer to improved gait speed.

03Children with cerebral palsy had significantly smaller brain volumes and lower white matter integrity in specific regions compared to controls.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTsWhat it means for OTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The sample size was very small, particularly for the resting-state fMRI analysis (9 children pre- and post-training), which limits statistical power. Head motion was a significant problem, leading to the exclusion of some data and requiring a lenient motion threshold that could bias results. The training dose (up to 20 hours) may have been too low to induce detectable brain changes, as other studies showing plasticity used much higher doses. The study only included children with bilateral cerebral palsy and diffuse white matter injury, so findings may not apply to other subtypes. Different sample sizes were used for different imaging modalities, making comparisons between modalities less direct.

Declared interests

The study was funded by the Intramural Research Program of the National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, the Cerebral Palsy Alliance Research Foundation, and the Johns Hopkins Neurosurgery Pain Research Institute. The authors declared no commercial or financial conflicts of interest.

The easy way to misread this

Do not conclude that brain training is ineffective for cerebral palsy. This study used a relatively low training dose and had a very small sample size with significant motion artifacts. The null findings on brain structure and connectivity may reflect these limitations rather than a true lack of effect.

Read it on PubMed →