Feasibility and usability of a wearable sensor system for gait assessment in children with neuromuscular diseases.
Nicoletta Battisti, Maria Giovanna Verrengia, Milena Pagnoni and 4 others
PMID 41626288WHAT IT FOUND
A wearable sensor system attached to shoelaces was feasible and highly usable for gait assessment in 12 ambulatory children with neuromuscular diseases.
Device-based measurements agreed with standard manual tests, and all participants completed the protocol.
Key findings
01All recruited patients completed the trials using the device, achieving 100% protocol adherence.
02The overall average System Usability Scale score for operators was 89.79, showing excellent usability values.
03Bland–Altman plots demonstrated good agreement between the measurements, particularly for the 6 Minute Walking Test.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTsWhat it means for OTs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
The study had a very small sample size of 12 patients, which limits the generalizability of the findings. Participants were exclusively ambulatory without assistive devices and had adequate cognitive abilities, excluding those with more severe disabilities or higher functional impairment. The study was conducted in a single clinical setting; ecological validity in home or school environments was not assessed. The algorithm adjustments for stride length estimation were empirical and based on this small, non-representative sample, requiring further validation. Only one smartphone model and operating system were used, which may have influenced connection reliability.
Declared interests
The publication was supported by 'Ricerca Corrente' funding from the Italian Ministry of Health. No other specific conflicts of interest regarding the device manufacturer were explicitly declared in the provided text.
The easy way to misread this
Do not assume the device measures speed identically to manual observation. In the 10-Meter Walk Test, the device recorded lower mean speeds (1.10 m/s) compared to the standard manual method (1.31 m/s), although the difference was not statistically significant.
Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →