PTOTSLPSystematic ReviewChild: care, health and development2026

Factors Contributing to Screen Exposure in Preschool Children and Its Associated Outcomes: A Systematic Review.

Maria Inês Gomes, Helena Sousa, Marisa Lousada and 1 others

PMID 41633402

WHAT IT FOUND

Parents' own excessive screen use and lack of clear rules are the strongest predictors of high screen time in preschoolers.

While most studies link high exposure to language and social delays, a few report benefits when use is interactive and educational. The evidence is observational, so causality is not proven.

Key findings

01Excessive parental screen use and the absence of screen time rules were the most frequently identified risk factors for increased child screen exposure.

02Language development deficits were the most common adverse outcome, reported in 21 of the 52 studies focusing on developmental difficulties.

03A minority of studies identified positive outcomes, such as improved language and cognitive skills, associated with educational or interactive screen use.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTsWhat it means for OTsWhat it means for SLPs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The vast majority of included studies were cross-sectional, meaning they cannot prove that screen time causes developmental delays; children with existing delays may also watch more screens. Most studies measured screen time as a single number (duration), failing to capture critical nuances like content type, context (e.g., co-viewing), or device used. There is a significant asymmetry in the literature, with 93 studies reporting adverse effects versus only 5 reporting positive effects, potentially reflecting publication bias or a deficit-focused research agenda. The review excluded children with neurodevelopmental disorders, so findings may not apply to populations commonly seen in therapy settings. Methodological quality varied, with 35.63% of cross-sectional studies failing to identify or address confounding factors.

Declared interests

The authors declared no conflicts of interest. The work was funded by Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (Portugal) and the European Social Fund.

The easy way to misread this

Do not interpret the associations as proof that screen time causes developmental delays. The evidence is observational and cross-sectional, so it is also possible that children with early developmental difficulties are given more screen time by parents seeking quiet or stimulation. Additionally, do not assume all screen time is harmful; the review notes that interactive, educational use in a supportive context may have neutral or positive effects.

Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →