PTOTCohortJournal of developmental and behavioral pediatrics : JDBP2025

Engagement With Recommended Developmental Follow-up and Supports Among Infants With Intrauterine Opioid Exposure.

Margarida Mascarenhas, Elizabeth Peacock-Chambers, Yarden S Fraiman and 2 others

PMID 40601929

WHAT IT FOUND

Among infants with prenatal opioid exposure, 93% were referred to early intervention, but only 73% were evaluated and 58% enrolled.

Only 34% attended a developmental follow-up visit. Infants staying with parents attended follow-up less often.

Key findings

01Early intervention engagement fell after referral: 93% of infants were referred, 73% completed evaluation, and 58% were enrolled within one year.

02Developmental follow-up clinic engagement was lower: 77% were referred, 34% completed at least one visit, and 20% completed two or more visits.

03In adjusted models, infants who remained in parental custody had a 38% lower probability of attending developmental follow-up, and care in the specialized substance use disorder clinic was associated with over 2 times the probability, but these developmental follow-up associations did not remain significant in a sensitivity analysis.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTsWhat it means for OTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

Single-site study at one urban academic medical center, so it may not apply to other hospitals or communities. Half of the infants received pediatric care outside the hospital network, so the researchers could not adjust for postpartum recovery stability, housing insecurity, and social supports. The sample was mostly non-Hispanic/Latinx white and publicly insured, so it may not represent communities with different demographics or insurance patterns. Data came from records, so missed information, misclassification, and unequal follow-up are possible. The study cannot prove why families engaged or did not engage, and it did not ask families about perceived need, stigma, or barriers. The developmental follow-up clinic associations were not significant in a sensitivity analysis, so they should be read cautiously.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read the higher developmental follow-up attendance after antipsychotic exposure or substance use disorder clinic care as proof that those factors cause better engagement. The study is retrospective and shows associations, and the developmental follow-up associations did not remain significant in a sensitivity analysis.

Read it on PubMed →