PTOTRCTNeuroRehabilitation2021

Efficacy and safety of onabotulinumtoxinA with standardized occupational therapy for treatment of pediatric upper limb spasticity: Phase III placebo-controlled randomized trial.

Rozalina Dimitrova, Emily McCusker, Mark Gormley and 5 others

PMID 34334431

WHAT IT FOUND

OnabotulinumtoxinA plus occupational therapy significantly reduced upper limb spasticity in children compared to placebo plus occupational therapy.

However, it did not significantly improve overall clinical impression of change or active functional goals at the primary time point, though passive goals showed some benefit.

Key findings

01Both doses of onabotulinumtoxinA significantly reduced muscle tone in the treated principal muscle group compared to placebo.

02The primary functional measure (Clinical Global Impression of Change) did not show a statistically significant difference between the treatment groups and placebo at the primary time point.

03Improvements were seen in passive goals but not in active functional goals when comparing treatment to placebo.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTsWhat it means for OTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

Only one principal muscle group was treated per participant, which does not reflect real-world clinical practice where multiple muscles are often injected. The study duration was relatively short (12 weeks), which may have been insufficient to detect changes in active functional goals. There was no independent rater for the Modified Ashworth Scale, relying instead on trained assessors. The lack of dose-response relationship suggests that higher doses did not yield proportionally better tone reduction outcomes.

Declared interests

The study was conducted in conformance with Good Clinical Practices and included an Independent Drug Reconstitutor to maintain blinding. The text does not explicitly list specific funding sources or author conflicts of interest in the provided sentences, but notes it was a registrational study for FDA approval.

The easy way to misread this

Do not interpret the significant reduction in muscle tone as evidence that the treatment improves active hand function. The study found no significant difference in active goal attainment compared to occupational therapy alone, and the functional outcomes were primarily limited to passive measures like splint tolerance.

Read it on PubMed →