Does Task-Specific Training Improve Upper Limb Performance in Daily Life Poststroke?
Kimberly J Waddell, Michael J Strube, Ryan R Bailey and 4 others
PMID 27909071WHAT IT FOUND
Task-specific training did not increase upper limb use in daily life for 78 people with chronic stroke, despite improvements in clinic capacity.
Neither the amount of practice nor gains in test scores predicted better real-world performance. Clinic gains did not carry over to home.
Key findings
01No participant increased upper limb performance in daily life as measured by accelerometers.
02Improvements in clinical capacity (ARAT scores) did not lead to changes in daily performance rates.
03The dose of task-specific practice did not influence changes in daily upper limb performance.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTsWhat it means for OTs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
The study included only people with chronic stroke (≥ 6 months post-stroke), so results may not apply to those in the early subacute phase. Accelerometers measure movement intensity and duration but cannot distinguish specific activities or movement quality (e.g., speed, accuracy). Small improvements in dexterity or specific task efficiency might have occurred but were not captured. The study used a single day of accelerometer data per week, which might not fully represent typical weekly patterns, though previous research suggests this is adequate. Participants were required to have mild-to-moderate paresis and sufficient cognitive skills, limiting generalizability to more severe or cognitively impaired populations.
Declared interests
The research was supported by the National Institutes of Health (Extramural). The text does not report any other conflicts of interest.
The easy way to misread this
Do not conclude that task-specific training is ineffective for all outcomes. The trial showed improvements in clinical capacity (ARAT scores) for many participants. The null finding applies specifically to the transfer of these gains to daily life performance as measured by accelerometers, not to the capacity itself.