PTOTSLPCohortPediatric physical therapy : the official publication of the Section on Pediatrics of the American Physical Therapy Association2021

Describing the Delivery of Evidence-Based Physical Therapy Intervention to Individuals With Cerebral Palsy.

Amy F Bailes, Kelly Greve, Jason Long and 4 others

PMID 33770793

WHAT IT FOUND

Therapists delivered evidence-based interventions in 48% of treatment selections for children with cerebral palsy, but usage dropped for those with the most severe motor impairment.

This suggests outpatient therapy may not be reaching the children who need it most, or that effective options for severe cases remain limited.

Key findings

01Green 'do it' interventions accounted for 48% of all therapy selections, while red 'do not do it' interventions made up 3%.

02Children with the highest level of motor impairment (GMFCS Level V) received the least amount of evidence-based interventions compared to other levels.

03Neuromuscular interventions were the most common category delivered, specifically motor control and functional strengthening.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTsWhat it means for OTsWhat it means for SLPs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The study only looked at hospital-based outpatient physical therapy, so it does not account for therapy received in schools, homes, or private clinics. It did not measure the intensity, duration, or frequency of the therapy sessions, only the types of interventions selected. The analysis could not link the types of interventions delivered to patient outcomes, so it is unknown if the variation in evidence-based practice affected functional progress. Results are from a single institution with a specific culture of continuous learning, which may not reflect practice patterns elsewhere. Some evidence-based interventions (like constraint-induced movement therapy) were not captured because they are delivered by other disciplines or in different settings.

The easy way to misread this

Do not interpret the low count of evidence-based interventions for GMFCS Level V patients as a failure of therapists to provide care. The study notes that these children may receive more services in school settings, and there is currently a limited range of evidence-based interventions proven effective for this specific population.

Read it on PubMed →