Community integration of adults with disabilities post discharge from an in-patient rehabilitation unit in the Western Cape.
Dietlind Gretschel, Surona Visagie, Gakeemah Inglis
PMID 30135906WHAT IT FOUND
Adults 7 to 9 months after inpatient rehabilitation in South Africa had low community integration, especially work, recreation, social activities and mobility.
The authors recommended targeting these areas.
Key findings
0159 adults scored a mean of 66.3 out of 100 on community integration 7 to 9 months after discharge.
02Participants had the greatest challenges in recreation, social activities, mobility and work or meaningful activities.
03Community integration did not differ significantly by gender, age, or diagnostic group.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTsWhat it means for OTs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
The study analysed 59 participants from a population of 188 discharged patients, and 49 could not be located, so the sample may not represent everyone leaving this centre. People who could not consent, lived in care facilities, could not speak English, Afrikaans or Xhosa, or could not complete a telephone questionnaire because of speech-language or cognitive impairment were excluded, so people with communication or cognitive difficulties may be missing. The small sample forced grouping of different diagnoses and ages, so differences between specific conditions are not clear. Employment was not recorded, even though work or meaningful activities was the lowest-scoring domain. Participants were assessed only 7 to 9 months after discharge at one government centre, so results may not apply to other times or settings. The study was descriptive, so it reports scores rather than showing whether an intervention changed community integration.
The easy way to misread this
Do not conclude that inpatient rehabilitation was ineffective or that spinal cord injury leads to better community integration. This was a descriptive study with a small sample, and the diagnostic differences were not statistically significant (p = 0.15).