Children With Cerebral Palsy Show Higher Static-But Not Higher Dynamic-Motor Fatigability in Grip and Pinch Tasks Than Children With Typical Development Do.
Lieke Brauers, Rob Smeets, Peter Feys and 6 others
PMID 37104625WHAT IT FOUND
Children with unilateral spastic cerebral palsy lost more strength while holding a grip or pinch as hard as possible, especially in the nonpreferred hand.
They did not show more fatigue during repeated squeeze tasks than typical children.
Key findings
01On the main static fatigability measure, children with unilateral spastic cerebral palsy showed more force loss during sustained grip in both hands and during sustained pinch in the nonpreferred hand.
02During repeated squeeze tasks, children with unilateral spastic cerebral palsy did not show consistently higher dynamic fatigability; some grip measures were higher in children with typical development.
03In children with unilateral spastic cerebral palsy, the nonpreferred hand showed more force loss during sustained grip and pinch than the preferred hand.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTsWhat it means for OTs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
The study used a convenience sample from schools, hospitals, and research programs in three countries, so the children may not represent all children with unilateral spastic cerebral palsy. Three invited children with unilateral spastic cerebral palsy could not complete the tests because of severe muscle weakness, and many test results had fewer than 53 children because some trials were invalid or incomplete, so the most impaired children are under-represented. Children were classified at Manual Ability Classification System levels I to III, so results may not apply to children with more severe hand function limitations. The study compared many static and dynamic outcomes in both hands, and the new force-ratio measures did not separate groups as well as the Static Fatigue Index, partly because of high variability. The design measured children at one time and did not test any intervention, so it cannot show that treatment would change fatigability or daily function. The study did not measure why fatigability occurred, such as muscle recruitment, lesion pattern, spasticity, or how fatigability affects activities of daily living. Testing occurred in different schools and countries, and two testers administered the protocol, which may have introduced small differences in how tasks were performed.
The easy way to misread this
Do not conclude that children with unilateral spastic cerebral palsy have normal dynamic endurance or that repeated squeeze tasks are unaffected. The dynamic results were inconsistent, and some measures were higher in children with typical development, so the clearer finding is higher static fatigability.