PTOTCohortJournal of rehabilitation medicine2025

Characteristics of subacute stroke patients who achieve earlier independence in real-life walking performance during hospitalization.

Kenji Kawakami, Shigeo Tanabe, Daiki Kinoshita and 5 others

PMID 39749425

WHAT IT FOUND

After subacute stroke, younger age, higher cognition, and better walking ability on admission predicted earlier independence in real ward walking; low daily-living ability or no walking ability predicted slower achievement.

Key findings

01Among 206 analysed patients, 102 (49.5%) achieved independence in real-life ward walking by discharge.

02The median time from admission to achieving a FIM-walking score of 6 or higher was 4 weeks (IQR 2-8 weeks).

03Age ≤64 years, FIM-C ≥25, and FAC ≥3 on admission were associated with earlier achievement, while FIM-M ≤38 and FAC = 0 were identified as factors that inhibited early achievement.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTsWhat it means for OTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The study was retrospective and used existing records, so it cannot show that any factor caused faster or slower recovery. All patients were in one Japanese convalescent hospital receiving a standardised programme, so the results may not apply to other settings. Independence was measured only as walking in a structured hospital ward, not in complex community environments. Patients who did not reach the walking score by discharge were censored at discharge, so achievement after discharge was not observed. The paper did not record the specific content or intensity of each patient's rehabilitation, so differences in therapy cannot be ruled out. Patients with prior stroke, no paralysis, very short stays, and other conditions were excluded, so the findings apply to a selected subacute hemiplegic stroke group.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read these admission scores as proof that a therapy caused faster walking independence. This was a retrospective observational study of existing records, so it describes factors associated with earlier achievement, not tested interventions.

Read it on PubMed →