OTQualitativeOccupational therapy international2022

Canadian Occupational Performance Measure: Benefits and Limitations Highlighted Using the Delphi Method and Principal Component Analysis.

Jean-Michel Caire, Sabrina Maurel-Techene, Thierry Letellier and 4 others

PMID 35300198

WHAT IT FOUND

French occupational therapists trained in the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure agreed it supports client-centered care and team decision-making.

They identified barriers including patient cognitive difficulties, lack of institutional knowledge, and time constraints. This reflects expert opinion on usability, not evidence of clinical outcomes.

Key findings

01Experts agreed the COPM facilitates client-centered practice by capturing the patient's voice and prioritizing their daily occupation issues.

02Major limitations included patient difficulties with attention, understanding, or behavior, and a lack of institutional knowledge of the model.

03The COPM was seen as a tool for interprofessional team decision-making and evaluating intervention outcomes, not just individual therapy.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for OTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The study reflects the opinions of a small, self-selected group of 33 experts who had already chosen to undergo specific training, which may bias results toward positive views of the tool. It reports consensus on usability and perceived value, not actual changes in patient outcomes or clinical efficacy. The Delphi method's anonymity prevented tracking how individual opinions changed across rounds, limiting understanding of how consensus was reached. Findings are specific to the French healthcare context and may not generalize to other systems with different institutional structures or training standards.

Declared interests

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The study was not funded by commercial entities; participants were recruited from a national occupational therapy association.

The easy way to misread this

Do not interpret the high consensus on benefits as proof that the COPM improves patient outcomes. This study reports what trained therapists believe about the tool's usability and conceptual fit, not clinical effectiveness data.

Read it on PubMed →