OTRCTJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2016

Benefits of virtual reality based cognitive rehabilitation through simulated activities of daily living: a randomized controlled trial with stroke patients.

Ana Lúcia Faria, Andreia Andrade, Luísa Soares and 1 others

PMID 27806718

WHAT IT FOUND

Stroke patients who used virtual reality daily living tasks improved more on a global cognitive test than patients doing conventional paper tasks.

The study was small, and assessors knew which treatment was given. Use it as a signal, not proof.

Key findings

01The virtual reality group improved significantly more than the conventional group on the primary global cognition measure, the Addenbrooke Cognitive Examination.

02The virtual reality group also improved more on the attention subtest, but not on memory, language, or visuo-spatial subtests.

03Both groups reported better subjective health on some Stroke Impact Scale domains, but there were no significant between-group differences on the strength, mobility, hand function, ADLs, memory, emotion, communication, social participation or overall recovery dimensions.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for OTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

Only 18 patients were studied, nine in each group, so chance findings cannot be ruled out. The assessor also delivered the virtual reality intervention, so expectations could have influenced the results. The total dose was 4 hours, which the authors say may have been too low to produce larger measurable improvements. The groups were heterogeneous, especially in months post-stroke, with medians of 7 in the virtual reality group and 4 in the control group. No corrections for multiple comparisons were performed. The study excluded patients with hemi-spatial neglect and moderate or severe language comprehension deficits, so it does not speak to those groups. The authors did not test transfer to real supermarket, pharmacy, post office or bank tasks, so real-world daily living improvement was not shown. Learning effects on repeated cognitive tests were possible because no parallel versions were used.

Declared interests

Funded by the European Commission, Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, and Agência Regional para o Desenvolvimento da Investigação, Tecnologia e Inovação. No author conflicts of interest are reported.

The easy way to misread this

Do not conclude that virtual reality cognitive training is proven to restore real-world daily living. This was a small, unblinded trial of 18 patients, and the authors did not assess transfer to actual supermarket, pharmacy, post office or bank tasks.

Read it on PubMed →