PTOTSLPCohortChild: care, health and development2025

Associations Between 24-h Movement Behaviours and Health in 3- and 4-Year-Old Children From a Low-Income Country: The SUNRISE Ethiopia Study.

Chalchisa Abdeta, Dylan Cliff, Katharina Kariippanon and 4 others

PMID 40435378

WHAT IT FOUND

Children who slept longer had lower body mass index scores.

Those with more physical activity had stronger handgrip, while more sitting time linked to weaker grip. No links were found for balance, jumping, or thinking skills.

Key findings

01Longer sleep duration was associated with lower adiposity (BMI z-score).

02Higher total and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity were associated with better handgrip strength, while more sedentary time was associated with lower handgrip strength.

03No significant associations were found between movement behaviours and other motor skills (balance, agility, fine motor) or executive functions (working memory, inhibition).

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTsWhat it means for OTsWhat it means for SLPs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The study is cross-sectional, so it cannot prove that sleep or activity causes changes in health or skills. Convenience sampling limits how well the results apply to other groups. Screen time was based on parent report, which may be inaccurate. The executive function tests used iPad tasks that may have been culturally unfamiliar to the children, potentially affecting their performance and the results. No adjustment was made for multiple statistical comparisons, which increases the chance of finding a 'significant' result by luck.

Declared interests

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

The easy way to misread this

Do not conclude that sedentary behaviour harms fine motor or cognitive development based on this paper. The lack of association may be due to the children being unfamiliar with the tablet-based testing tools, rather than a true absence of effect.

Read it on PubMed →