PTOTOtherJournal of physical therapy science2016

Analysis of affected and non-affected sides of stroke hemiparalysis patients and correlations between rehabilitation therapy assessments using the bioelectrical impedance analysis method.

ChanUk Yoo, SeongKyo Suh, YoungGyu Kim

PMID 28174440

WHAT IT FOUND

In 20 stroke patients with hemiplegia, a body electrical measure called phase angle was lower on the paralyzed side and tracked grip strength, hand dexterity, and daily activity independence.

Another body electrical measure was also lower, but the resistance measure did not differ.

Key findings

01The paralyzed side had lower mean reactance (37.9) and phase angle (3.7) than the non-paralyzed side (43.5 and 4.2), while resistance did not differ.

02Phase angle correlated positively with hand grip power (0.704), manual dexterity (0.469), and daily activity independence (0.594).

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTsWhat it means for OTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The study included only 20 patients at one hospital, so the findings are unstable and may not apply elsewhere. The paper does not state a primary outcome; several measures were examined, and only some were significant. No treatment was tested, so the study cannot show whether bioimpedance changes with rehabilitation or improves patient outcomes. The authors' claim that bioimpedance can be an objective assessment tool appears in the discussion and is not demonstrated by a diagnostic accuracy or outcome study. The paper does not report dropouts, missing data, blinding, or measurement order. The sample was mostly women and had an average time since stroke onset of 23.4 months, so acute or different populations are not represented.

The easy way to misread this

Do not conclude bioimpedance can objectively guide stroke rehabilitation decisions. The study measured 20 patients once and did not test whether phase angle changes with therapy or predicts patient outcomes.

Read it on PubMed →