OTRCTRehabilitation psychology2022

An app-based just-in-time-adaptive self-management intervention for care partners: The CareQOL feasibility pilot study.

Noelle E Carlozzi, Sung Won Choi, Zhenke Wu and 7 others

PMID 36355640

WHAT IT FOUND

People caring for someone with spinal cord injury, Huntington disease or a stem cell transplant stuck with a 90-day app and Fitbit: 69 of 70 finished.

The app group scored better on 3 of 10 measures, but the trial was too small to confirm benefit.

Key findings

01Sixty-nine of the 70 care partners finished the study, and the Fitbit, the CareQOL app and the study surveys were all rated acceptable against the researchers' pre-set targets.

02At 3 months the app group had significantly lower caregiver strain, depression and sleep-related impairment than the control group after adjusting for baseline scores, and these differences held after correcting for multiple comparisons.

03The daily ratings showed no change over time in depression, while anxiety fell in both the app and control groups, which the authors say suggests the daily questions themselves affected how people rated their anxiety.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for OTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The trial was not powered to test whether the intervention works; the authors say so and call the comparisons exploratory. Ten separate quality-of-life comparisons were run, so some of the three significant results could still be chance even though the correction did not remove them. Everyone knew whether they were getting messages, and the control group still wore the same Fitbit and answered the same daily questions, so part of any benefit may come from taking part rather than from the app. Caregivers were mostly White and mostly women, so the results may not carry to other caregivers. All participants came from one US centre and had to own a smartphone or tablet with internet and be willing to use it, which leaves out caregivers without that technology. The two groups tended to differ on whether the care partner worked; adjusting for this did not change the pattern, but the groups were small. The findings say nothing about care partners of people with more acute conditions or other chronic illnesses.

Declared interests

The text supplied does not report who funded the work and contains no conflict-of-interest declaration. It states that data and supporting materials are available by emailing the corresponding author and that the trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04556591).

The easy way to misread this

Do not read the three significant 3-month differences as proof the app works. The authors state the trial was not powered to test efficacy, the comparisons were exploratory across many outcomes, and the daily ratings showed no change in depression in either group.

Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →