Voice Quality in Individuals With Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome.
Vanessa Medina, Andrea Baldi de Freitas, Luiz Carlos Rusilo and 2 others
PMID 42683772WHAT IT FOUND
Blinded listeners could tell older adults with AIDS from controls almost every time, by tongue backing, pharyngeal narrowing and a harsh, creaky or whispery voice.
Acoustic measures were weaker. Nothing here shows what causes the pattern.
Key findings
01Women with AIDS were heard most often with a narrowed pharynx and reduced tongue and jaw movement, along with creaky voice and brief episodes of two pitches sounding at once.
02Men with AIDS were heard most often with a retracted and lowered tongue, pharyngeal constriction, a tense vocal tract with a lax larynx, and whisper or harsh voice.
03Judges who did not know which group each voice came from sorted 98.68% of AIDS-group samples and 98.31% of control samples correctly using perceptual descriptions, while acoustic measures alone classified only 77.37% and 77.53% correctly.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for SLPs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
Only 29 people were studied and the groups were unequal: 20 with AIDS against 9 controls. The authors say this limits how far the findings can be generalised. Everyone in both groups had metabolic conditions such as dyslipidaemia, and everyone with AIDS also had lipodystrophy, so this is not a comparison of AIDS against healthy ageing. The voices were recorded once, so nothing here shows whether the pattern changes over time or how it develops. The authors state that the pattern reflects the combined effect of long-term antiretroviral therapy, opportunistic disease, lipodystrophy, ageing and metabolic change, and that the contribution of any one of these cannot be separated out. The acoustic measures separated the groups poorly and differed between groups only in the male subgroup. Recordings were made in 2012. The authors argue the stored data remain valid, but the treatment context has changed since then. The study was not designed to test any treatment, and the authors say the findings do not support proposing a therapy protocol.
Declared interests
Funded by the Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq), grant 311596/2022-23. The authors declare no conflict of interest.
The easy way to misread this
Do not read these voice patterns as caused by AIDS, by antiretroviral therapy or by lipodystrophy. Everyone in the AIDS group had all of these at once, plus ageing and metabolic conditions, and the authors state that the findings reflect their combined effect and that no single factor can be separated out. Do not read the 98.68% and 98.31% figures as a measure of how well anyone can spot these voices by ear in clinic. They describe how well a statistical model sorted already-labelled samples using three trained judges' descriptions.
Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →