Vocal Function Exercises With and Without Maximally Sustained Phonation: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Individuals With Normal Voice.
Maria Bane, Mariah Morton, Vrushali Angadi and 2 others
PMID 36379827WHAT IT FOUND
Requiring the longest sustained phonation in Vocal Function Exercises did not produce significantly better improvement than capping it after three weeks or holding it at baseline.
All three groups improved, and the between-group difference was not significant.
Key findings
01The difference in improvement among the three groups was not statistically significant (p = 0.67), so requiring the longest sustained phonation did not produce better results than the two modified versions.
02Within groups, the midpoint group (p = 0.008) and traditional group (p = 0.001) both improved significantly in percent of maximum phonation time goal attained, while the baseline group did not (p = 0.0202).
03The authors' hypothesis that maximally sustained phonation would yield greater improvement was rejected because the between-group difference was not significant and both the traditional and midpoint groups improved.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for SLPs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
Only 23 participants completed the study, and the authors note the unknown effect size of maximally sustained phonation complicated the sample size calculation. All participants had normal voice, so the findings cannot be applied to patients with voice disorders. Compliance with home practice was self-reported via practice logs and could not be verified by the investigator. Research assistants who conducted weekly maintenance sessions were well-trained but lacked experience in delivering Vocal Function Exercises. The study lasted only six weeks, so it is unknown whether the midpoint and baseline groups would eventually catch up to the traditional group. Only three variations of the sustained phonation requirement were tested.
Declared interests
The first four authors declared no conflicts of interest. The last author receives textbook and educational product royalties from Plural Publishing and Medbridge.
The easy way to misread this
Do not read this as proof that you can skip sustained phonation entirely in Vocal Function Exercises. The baseline group, which was capped at their starting level, did not improve significantly. The finding is that the degree of the requirement can be modified, not that it can be removed. And every participant had normal voice, so this says nothing about a patient with a voice disorder.
Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →