PTRNSystematic ReviewPatient education and counseling2017

Using digital interventions for self-management of chronic physical health conditions: A meta-ethnography review of published studies.

Katherine Morton, Laura Dennison, Carl May and 4 others

PMID 28029572

WHAT IT FOUND

Patients using digital self-management tools felt more aware of their condition and motivated by their readings, while some relied on clinicians to detect problems.

Clinicians valued control but worried about monitoring burden. This reports experiences, not outcome effects.

Key findings

01Across 30 included qualitative studies, patients generally perceived digital self-management interventions as increasing awareness of their condition and confidence in health decisions.

02Standalone tele-monitoring without behaviour-change support was still reported to motivate self-management behaviours, including medication adherence and physical activity, when patients could connect readings to daily actions.

03Patients valued being monitored by health care professionals, but professionals worried about workload and unclear responsibility for out-of-range readings.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTsWhat it means for RNs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The review synthesises experiences, not tested effects, so it cannot show whether digital self-management interventions improve health outcomes. Patient views may be more positive than average because included studies used people who volunteered for trials and follow-up qualitative research. The synthesis relied mainly on the primary author's analysis, and the authors acknowledged their own preconceptions could influence the themes. Some included studies were rated low or medium quality, and common omissions included researcher influence, ethical details, and justification of triangulation. Confidence in the themes was moderate, not high, so the findings are reasonable but not definitive representations of patient and professional experiences.

Declared interests

An author is Managing Director of a not-for-profit company that disseminates digital health interventions to the NHS. She states she has not and will not receive remuneration for this work.

The easy way to misread this

Do not conclude that digital self-management interventions improve health outcomes or reduce clinician workload. This review synthesises patient and clinician experiences from qualitative studies, not tested effects on health outcomes, and clinicians reported monitoring burden and unclear responsibility.

Read it on PubMed →