RNPilotNursing research

Exploring the Vaginal Microbiome and Intravaginal Practices in Postmenopausal Women.

Gaea A Daniel, Yingtian Hu, Despina Tsementzi and 6 others

PMID 34262008

WHAT IT FOUND

In 21 postmenopausal women, reported intravaginal practices were not associated with vaginal microbiome diversity or bacterial dominance.

The study was underpowered, so it cannot show these practices are safe or harmful.

Key findings

01The main comparison found no association between intravaginal practice use and vaginal microbiome diversity or bacterial abundance.

02Ten women never used intravaginal practices since menopause, and 11 used at least one; soap and water inside the vagina was the most common practice.

03Lactobacillus was dominant in 23.8% of samples, while Prevotella species dominated 28.6% of samples.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

Only 21 healthy postmenopausal women were analysed, and the authors state the pilot is underpowered, so it cannot support general conclusions. The vaginal cleansing questionnaire was developed for this study and was not previously validated. Participants were healthy controls; women with cancer, cystic fibrosis, poorly controlled diabetes, autoimmune disease, STIs, or current fungal infection were excluded, so it does not describe those groups. The study was a secondary analysis of baseline data, not a test of whether intravaginal practices cause microbiome change. Microbiome analysis was genus level because species assignment was often missing, so species-specific effects cannot be seen. The study focused on intravaginal practices, not other behaviours that may contribute to microbiome changes, such as smoking, number of sexual partners, and antibiotic use.

Declared interests

The article is supported by NIH and non-U.S. government research funding. REDCap data tools were hosted at Emory University with Library Information Technology Services grant support. No explicit author conflict-of-interest declaration is included.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read the null microbiome association as proof that intravaginal products are safe. The study included only 21 postmenopausal women and was underpowered, so it cannot show whether products help or harm the vaginal microbiome.

Read it on PubMed →