RNSystematic ReviewThe Journal of cardiovascular nursing2017

Use of Short Messaging Service for Hypertension Management: A Systematic Review.

Grecia Vargas, Maan Isabella Cajita, Erin Whitehouse and 1 others

PMID 27111819

WHAT IT FOUND

Text messaging for hypertension lowered blood pressure in three of six studies, but not in the other three.

The evidence was too varied and low quality to combine, so do not expect a clear blood-pressure benefit from text messaging alone.

Key findings

01The review included 6 studies, but the studies varied too much to produce a pooled blood-pressure effect estimate.

02Three studies reported improved BP outcomes and three reported no significant BP outcomes.

03Five studies had high risk of bias and one had unclear risk, with selection bias present in all six.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

Only 6 studies met inclusion criteria, so the review could not answer which SMS format works best. The meta-analysis was not completed because the studies varied too much: I2 was 93.5% for systolic BP and 89.9% for diastolic BP. Five studies had high risk of bias and one unclear risk; all 6 had selection bias, and only 2 used random assignment. Only 3 studies had 80% statistical power; the other 3 did not report power or had unknown power. SMS content, frequency, duration, and whether it was the main or supplemental component varied widely, so the effect of SMS alone could not be isolated. Sample sizes were limited and samples were predominantly white, so generalizability is narrow. No study reported cost effectiveness, so feasibility in usual care is unclear.

The easy way to misread this

Do not conclude that text messaging lowers blood pressure. The review included only 6 studies, 3 reported improved BP and 3 reported no significant BP, and SMS was often combined with education, coaching, or provider feedback, so the effect of SMS alone cannot be separated.

Read it on PubMed →