Understanding Stability and Change in Perceived Social Support in Parents of Autistic Children and Adolescents.
Jonathan A Weiss, Suzanne Robinson, Rebecca Pillai Riddell and 1 others
PMID 36188809WHAT IT FOUND
Perceived social support, parent stress, and child behavior problems remained stable over one year.
Higher support predicted lower stress and fewer behavior problems at 6 months, but stress and behavior did not predict later support. Interventions targeting support may help, but stability suggests early access is key.
Key findings
01Perceived social support, parent stress, and child behavior problems showed considerable stability over the 1-year period.
02Baseline perceived social support predicted lower parent stress and fewer child behavior problems at 6 months, but these variables did not predict subsequent social support.
03There were no significant relationships between perceived social support and child behavior problems between the 6-month and 12-month time points.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for OTsWhat it means for SLPs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
The sample was recruited through community organizations and a research database, meaning parents were likely already engaged with autism services or research, which may not generalize to all parents of children with autism. The sample was primarily well-educated mothers living in suburban or urban areas in Canada, limiting diversity. Data relied entirely on self-report surveys, which can inflate associations due to shared method variance. Autism diagnoses were confirmed via parent report and screening questionnaires rather than in-person diagnostic testing. The 1-year follow-up period may be too short to capture meaningful changes in stress, support, or behavior, which the authors note are often chronic. Survey measures used different reference timeframes (e.g., stress over the last week vs. support over the last 4 weeks), which may have influenced the strength of associations.
Declared interests
The authors declared no conflicts of interest. The study was supported by a grant from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada.
The easy way to misread this
Do not interpret the finding that support predicts lower stress and behavior as evidence that increasing support will cause these improvements in clinical practice. The study is observational, showing associations over time, not a test of an intervention. Additionally, the effects were small and limited to the first 6 months, with no significant effects found between 6 and 12 months.