Trends in Collection of Microbiological Cultures Across Veterans Affairs Community Living Centers in the United States Over 8 Years.
Haley J Appaneal, Aisling R Caffrey, Maria-Stephanie A Hughes and 4 others
PMID 31466935WHAT IT FOUND
Culture collection in VA Community Living Centers fell, especially urine cultures.
The share of blood and respiratory cultures that were positive fell. No resident outcomes were measured.
Key findings
01Between 2010 and 2017, 355,329 cultures were collected from residents admitted to 146 VA CLCs, and positive microbial growth was reported in 42.0% of cultures.
02Cultures collected per admission fell from 1.6 in 2010 to 0.9 in 2017 and decreased significantly by 8.3% per year; the rate per 1000 bed days decreased by 6.0% per year.
03Urine cultures were the most common type, and the proportion of positive blood and respiratory tract cultures decreased while urine and skin and soft tissue cultures remained stable.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
The study counted cultures but did not assess why they were ordered or whether residents had symptoms. It could not separate true infection from colonization or contamination because any recovered organism was counted as positive. Multiple cultures from the same resident could overstate positive organism results. It did not measure antibiotic use, resistance, hospitalizations, costs, or other resident outcomes. Results may not apply to non-VA long-term care facilities because VA residents had more complex medical needs and staffing levels were higher. Outside laboratory cultures may not have been captured, and exact culture sites were not always known. The study did not measure why culture collection fell. Infection control and antibiotic stewardship are author explanations, not measured causes.
The easy way to misread this
Do not read the fall in culture collection as proof that fewer infections were prevented or that antibiotics were reduced. The study counted culture collection and positivity only; it did not assess culture indications, true infection versus colonization, antibiotic use, or resident outcomes.