OTRNCohortNursing open2019

Toileting difficulties in older people with and without dementia receiving formal in-home care-A longitudinal study.

Frida Grimsland, Arnfinn Seim, Tom Borza and 1 others

PMID 31367431

WHAT IT FOUND

Older people receiving formal in-home care had more toileting difficulties over 36 months.

Baseline dementia was associated with more than twofold higher toileting difficulties at the last assessment, and later nursing home admission with more than ten times higher toileting difficulties.

Key findings

01Toileting difficulties increased over time among participants receiving formal in-home care, and participants with dementia had toileting difficulties more often than participants without dementia at all time points.

02In adjusted analysis, baseline dementia was associated with more than twofold higher odds of toileting difficulties at the final assessment: odds ratio 2.69 (95% CI 1.47; 4.92) with PSMS and odds ratio 2.07 (95% CI 1.14; 3.76) with IPLOS.

03In adjusted analysis, nursing home admission after baseline was associated with more than tenfold higher odds of toileting difficulties at the final assessment: odds ratio 11.12 (95% CI 6.07; 20.38) with PSMS and odds ratio 10.60 (95% CI 5.75; 19.53) with IPLOS.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for OTsWhat it means for RNs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

Because the design was observational, it cannot show that dementia or nursing home admission caused toileting difficulties, or that toileting difficulties caused nursing home admission. 795 of 1,796 eligible people declined to participate, and those who declined were older and more often women than those included, so the sample may not represent all people receiving formal in-home care. Only people with a next of kin who saw them at least once a week were eligible, and toileting information came from next-of-kin and health personnel reports rather than direct patient self-report. Attrition was large: 324 participants died during follow-up, and only 456 people were included at the final assessment, which may bias the results. The measures recorded need for assistance and broad toileting difficulty but did not distinguish urinary incontinence, faecal incontinence, or specific toilet-transfer problems. The study was done in Norwegian formal in-home care, so generalising to other health systems is limited.

Declared interests

The authors declare having no conflict of interest.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read the more than ten times higher odds for nursing home admission as proof that toileting difficulties cause admission. The study is observational, and it could not tell whether toileting difficulties came before admission or after admission.

Read it on PubMed →