The status and predictors of self-care among older adults with hypertension in China using the Chinese version of Self-Care of Hypertension Inventory - A cross-sectional study.
Yu-Jie Guo, Xiao-Yun Hu, Hong-Juan Ji and 6 others
PMID 35014206WHAT IT FOUND
477 of 544 older adults with hypertension in four Chinese hospitals had poor self-care scores, especially asking for low-salt food, recognising high blood pressure and evaluating blood pressure changes.
Key findings
01477 of 544 older adults had total self-care scores below 210, which the authors classified as poor.
02Poor self-care was common in all domains: 458 of 544 had poor maintenance, 278 of 378 with recent high blood pressure had poor management, and 418 of 544 had poor confidence.
03Better overall self-care was associated with being younger, living alone, having other primary caregivers, often receiving self-care education, and having a higher maximum systolic blood pressure.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
All 544 participants were convenience sampled from cardiology and geriatrics departments in one city, so the results may not represent older adults with hypertension in other regions or settings. The study was cross-sectional, so it cannot show that education, living alone, caregiver type, insurance, disease duration, or blood pressure caused better self-care. Only 378 of 544 participants completed the self-care management subscale because it was asked only of those who had elevated blood pressure in the past month, so that part describes a subgroup. The regression models were significant but did not explain much of the variation, suggesting important predictors were missing. Some participants needed help completing questionnaires because of low education, poor vision or hand shaking, which may have affected responses. The analysis considered mainly demographic and clinical information, not broader psychological, family and social factors.
Declared interests
The authors declared no conflicts of interest. The study was funded by the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province.
The easy way to misread this
Do not read better self-care among people who often received education as proof that education improved self-care. This was a cross-sectional survey, so it measured education and self-care at the same time and cannot show cause.