The Performance of Ankle- and Waist-Based Accelerometry in Quantifying Physical Activity Intensity Among 6- to 24-Month-Year-Olds: A Semistructured Laboratory Study.
Hannah J Dorris, Delaina D Carlson, Grace A Ballarino and 2 others
PMID 39806550WHAT IT FOUND
Ankle and waist accelerometry could not reliably separate five activity levels in 38 infants and toddlers.
Ankle devices matched video-coded activity as sedentary or not 77.6% of the time, and total counts estimated overall activity time.
Key findings
01Classifying five separate activity levels was poor for both ankle and waist devices, with agreement under 50% and kappa 0.25 or less.
02When activity was collapsed into higher versus lower levels, the left ankle device reached 77.6% agreement and kappa 0.54 among all children, while the waist device reached 72.5% agreement and kappa 0.43.
03Aggregate vector magnitude counts modelled time spent in higher-level activity, with model fit R² 0.68 from the left ankle and 0.69 from the right ankle among all children.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
The analysis included 38 children, and only 15 were nonambulatory, so findings for children who cannot walk independently are less stable. The study had only 77 epochs in levels 4 to 5 for nonambulatory children. The visit was a 30-minute laboratory session with encouraged play, not a full day at home or in the community. Epochs were excluded when the child was picked up by an adult or was playing with the devices, but in practice those movements are common and the accelerometer cannot separate them from the child's own movement. The waist device was worn near the hip with an elastic belt, not directly above the right hip as in some prior studies, so results may not apply to a different hip placement. The ankle classification was acceptable but not high, and there was considerable child-to-child variability within activity levels. The study did not test wrist-worn devices.
Declared interests
The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The study was funded by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, and the funder had no role in study design, analysis, writing, or publication.
The easy way to misread this
Do not conclude that ankle accelerometry can accurately identify moderate-to-vigorous activity in an individual infant. The five-level classifier performed poorly, with agreement under 50% and kappa 0.25 or less, and only a sedentary-or-not classification reached acceptable agreement.