RNSurveyJournal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing2023

The perceived effects of COVID-19 while living with a chronic illness.

Mary Ryder, Suzanne Guerin, Rita Forde and 5 others

PMID 36281970

WHAT IT FOUND

People with chronic illness said remote care increased reliance on self-report and reduced routine checks. 47.4% had no change in face-to-face contact.

Nurses should prepare patients for symptom monitoring.

Key findings

01Among 95 people reporting face-to-face contacts before and during restrictions, 47.4% reported no change, 41.1% reported a decrease and 11.6% reported an increase.

02People with chronic illness reported lower self-care and care-assessment scores than published comparison samples, and higher perceived COVID-19 impact was associated with lower self-care confidence and lower care ratings.

03Open responses described remote care as reducing routine checks and increasing reliance on self-report, while some participants valued easier access and less travel.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The sample was a convenience group recruited through social media, so it may not represent all people with chronic illness. Only 147 people completed the survey, and only 14.5% were aged 60 or older, limiting transferability to older patients. The study used self-report and cross-sectional associations, so it cannot show that virtual care caused lower self-care or worse access.

Declared interests

The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read the lower self-care scores as proof that remote care caused harm. The study did not test a remote-care intervention, and 47.4% reported no change in face-to-face contacts while 11.6% reported an increase.

Read it on PubMed →