PTOTCohortJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2024

Telerehabilitation using a 2-D planar arm rehabilitation robot for hemiparetic stroke: a feasibility study of clinic-to-home exergaming therapy.

Gabriel Aguirre-Ollinger, Karen Sui Geok Chua, Poo Lee Ong and 12 others

PMID 39593101

WHAT IT FOUND

Twelve chronic stroke survivors used a home robot with carer supervision for 30 days.

Adherence was high at 87.7% and no one dropped out due to injury. Arm function improved modestly, but half did not reach a clinically meaningful gain.

Key findings

01All 12 participants completed the 30-day home training phase without adverse events such as increased pain or spasticity.

02Home training adherence averaged 87.7% of days, exceeding the study's initial feasibility goal of 75%.

03Upper limb motor function improved significantly by week 24, but only 25% of participants achieved a minimal clinically important difference.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTsWhat it means for OTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The study had no control group, so it is impossible to determine if the observed improvements were due to the robot, the natural course of recovery, or the concomitant conventional OT that 8 of the 12 participants received. The sample size was very small (n=12), and the study was not powered to detect differences in clinical or economic outcomes. The exact intensity and content of the concomitant conventional OT received by participants were not documented, making it difficult to isolate the effect of the home robot. The home training phase was limited to 30 days, which may not reflect long-term adherence or the durability of effects beyond that period. Participants were mostly male, younger than the average stroke population, and had a high proportion of hemorrhagic strokes, which may limit generalizability to older or more diverse patient groups.

Declared interests

The study was supported by the National Health Innovation Centre, Singapore, and the Temasek Foundation. The device used (H-Man) is a commercial product from Articares Pte Ltd, and the software platform was developed by the same company. The authors note that the vendor delivered and set up the devices, and the software developers added exergames during the study period.

The easy way to misread this

Do not interpret the statistically significant group-level FMA improvements as proof that the robot caused clinically meaningful recovery. Only 3 of the 12 participants achieved a minimal clinically important difference, and 8 participants received concurrent conventional therapy, so the specific contribution of the home robot cannot be separated from other treatments.

Read it on PubMed →