PTOTSLPRCTJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2026

Targeted ankle proprioceptive training improves balance, gait, and functional mobility in chronic stroke survivors: a multicenter randomized controlled trial with longitudinal follow-up.

Muslim Khan, Ayman Abdullah Alhammad, Mshari Alghadier and 7 others

PMID 42216149

WHAT IT FOUND

Targeted ankle proprioceptive training improved balance and walking more than standard care in chronic stroke survivors.

The robotic-assisted discrimination tasks and weight-bearing challenges produced gains that were maintained at six months.

Key findings

01The intervention group improved by 0.21 on affected-side inversion proprioception compared to 0.04 in controls.

02Berg Balance Scale scores increased by 12.4 points versus 4.2 points, and gait speed improved by 0.32 m/s versus 0.09 m/s.

03Improvements in inversion proprioception mediated 72% of the functional gains in balance and gait.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTsWhat it means for OTsWhat it means for SLPs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The study relied on specialized robotic devices, which may limit accessibility and generalizability to settings without this equipment. The intervention intensity (180 minutes per week) exceeds typical outpatient care, potentially limiting direct clinical translation without increased resources. The longitudinal subsample used convenience sampling, which may introduce selection bias. The trial was retrospectively registered, which reduces methodological transparency and raises the possibility of outcome switching, although the authors state endpoints remained consistent with their internal protocol. Treating researchers were not blinded due to the nature of the intervention delivery, though outcome assessors were blinded.

Declared interests

The paper does not report specific funding sources or conflicts of interest declarations in the provided text.

The easy way to misread this

Do not assume these results are directly applicable to standard clinical practice without the specific robotic equipment and high treatment intensity used in the trial. The large effect sizes may reflect the high sensitivity of this population to mechanism-driven sensory challenges compared to non-specific motor training, and the retrospective registration introduces some uncertainty about the pre-specified outcomes.

Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →