Six-minute walk test reference values in ambulatory children with myelomeningocele.
Karina A Zapata, Rosa H Cooksey, Daralyn K Fulton and 3 others
PMID 40556501WHAT IT FOUND
Reference walking distances for children with myelomeningocele vary widely by lesion level, from 215 meters for mid-lumbar to 420 meters for sacral lesions.
Shorter 1-minute and 2-minute tests strongly predict these results, offering a faster option for busy clinics.
Key findings
01Children with mid-lumbar lesions walked 215 meters, low-lumbar 344 meters, and sacral 420 meters on the 6-minute walk test.
02Distances walked in 1 minute and 2 minutes were strongly associated with the 6-minute distance, suggesting shorter tests can predict full results.
03Children with public insurance or living in more disadvantaged neighborhoods walked significantly fewer meters than those with private insurance or in less disadvantaged areas.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
The study was conducted at a single center in the southwest United States, so results may not apply to other populations. Data was cross-sectional, so it cannot show how walking distance changes over time in individual children. Almost half of the participants identified as Hispanic, which may limit generalizability to other ethnic groups, although no differences in walking distance were found based on ethnicity.
Declared interests
The authors stated they had no conflicts of interest. The study did not require external funding.
The easy way to misread this
Do not assume that a child's walking distance is poor because it is far below neurotypical norms. The study shows that reference values must be specific to the child's functional lesion level, as even high-functioning children with sacral lesions walk significantly less than typical peers.
Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →