Sensory Sensitivity and Food Selectivity in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder.
Liem T Chistol, Linda G Bandini, Aviva Must and 3 others
PMID 29116421WHAT IT FOUND
In children with ASD, Atypical oral sensory sensitivity was associated with more food refusal (48.2% vs 33.2%) and lower vegetable variety (4.2 vs 8.6).
Atypical oral over-sensitivity was associated with more food refusal (52% vs 25%) and lower fruit and vegetable variety.
Key findings
01Children with ASD were more often classified Atypical for Oral Sensory Sensitivity (64% vs 7%) and Oral Sensory Over-sensitivity (66% vs 9%) than typically developing children.
02Among children with ASD, Atypical Oral Sensory Sensitivity was associated with higher food refusal (48.2% vs 33.2%) and lower vegetable variety (4.2 vs 8.6).
03Among children with ASD, Atypical Oral Sensory Over-sensitivity was associated with higher food refusal (52% vs 25%), lower fruit variety (5.3 vs 8.2), and lower vegetable variety (4.2 vs 8.9).
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for OTsWhat it means for SLPs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
The study was cross-sectional, so it cannot show that oral sensory sensitivity causes food selectivity. Parents reported sensory responses with a questionnaire, and the authors note this may include caregiver bias rather than direct observation. The study was advertised as a mealtime and physical activity study, so parents of children with feeding difficulties may have been more likely to take part. The food measures could not distinguish foods the child refused from foods the parent did not offer because of past refusal. The Food Frequency Questionnaire was limited to listed foods, and the 3-day food record may not represent a child's usual diet. The study did not collect parents' own food preferences, which may affect what foods are offered at home. Children from a wider range of racial, ethnic, and socio-economic backgrounds were not represented, so the findings may not generalise. The study did not assess oral sensory under-sensitivity, which may relate to different eating behaviours. Analyses of food selectivity and oral sensory status were limited to children with ASD because too few typically developing children scored Atypical.
Declared interests
The authors declared that they have no conflict of interest. The supplied text does not state a funding source.
The easy way to misread this
Do not conclude that oral sensory sensitivity causes food selectivity or that changing food texture or using sensory integration will improve a child's diet. This paper reports associations from a cross-sectional sample and does not test a feeding intervention.