OTCohortThe Journal of head trauma rehabilitation2017

Rehospitalization Over 10 Years Among Survivors of TBI: A National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems Study.

Kristen Dams-OʼConnor, Dave Mellick, Laura E Dreer and 5 others

PMID 28476056

WHAT IT FOUND

Rehospitalization after TBI rehabilitation discharge was common: 27.8% of participants at 1 year, 23.0% at 2 years, 22.1% at 5 years, and 23.4% at 10 years.

Reasons moved toward general health and psychiatric causes.

Key findings

01At 1 year, 27.8% of participants reported rehospitalization; at 2 years, 23.0%; at 5 years, 22.1%; and at 10 years, 23.4%.

02Orthopedic and reconstructive surgery accounted for 17.1% of rehospitalizations at year 1; general health reasons accounted for 18.7% at year 2, 21.9% at year 5, and 23.7% at year 10. These are proportions of total rehospitalizations, not of people.

03Participants who were rehospitalized were more likely to be unemployed, on Medicare or Medicaid, and have lower education.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for OTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

Rehospitalization data were based on self-report from people with TBI or their proxy, so recall bias is possible. The database includes people treated at specialized TBI rehabilitation centers, so results may not apply to all TBI survivors. Reasons were coded into broad categories, so a hospitalization could reflect planned improvement or decline, and the study cannot say whether it was elective, planned, preventative, or corrective. The analyses looked at rehospitalization during a specific interview year, not cumulative rehospitalization over 10 years. The longitudinal sample was smaller and differed from the cross-sectional sample; it required at least three temporal measures and was not representative of people who died soon after injury or were recently added. The longitudinal models are descriptive, not inferential, and the authors caution that they should not be used to predict prognosis for an individual patient. No treatment was assigned, so the study cannot show that any discharge plan or follow-up service reduces rehospitalization.

Declared interests

The study was funded by NIDILRR within the Agency on Community Living in Health and Human Services. The authors declared no conflicts of interest and no party with a direct interest in the results will confer a benefit.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read the rehospitalization rates or risk trajectories as proof that a particular discharge plan or follow-up service prevents rehospitalization. The study was descriptive and did not test a service or discharge plan. The authors also caution that the models should not be used to predict prognosis for an individual patient.

Read it on PubMed →