Real-World Experiences of Therapy Staff Implementing an Intensive Rehabilitation Protocol in Canadian Stroke Inpatient Rehabilitation Settings: A Multi-Site Survey Study.
Stanley H Hung, Suzanne Ackerley, Louise A Connell and 11 others
PMID 41139309WHAT IT FOUND
Most therapy staff found intensive walking protocols helpful but struggled to meet step targets within standard 30-minute sessions.
Time constraints and discharge planning competed with therapy goals. Wearable devices were valued for feedback, though staff doubted their accuracy for patients with slower or atypical gaits.
Key findings
01Only 36% of staff agreed they had sufficient time to deliver the intensive protocol, with many reporting that 30-minute slots were too short to meet step targets.
02Staff perceived the step and heart rate targets as unrealistic for patients with lower function levels, with only 26% and 47% respectively agreeing they achieved these targets.
03While 87% of staff felt confident using the wearable devices, only about half planned to use them in future practice due to concerns about accuracy for patients with slower or atypical gait patterns.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTsWhat it means for OTsWhat it means for SLPs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
The survey was self-administered and self-reported, which may introduce self-selection bias if staff with strong opinions about intensive rehabilitation were more likely to respond. Social desirability bias may have influenced responses, as participants might have reported more positive experiences than they actually held. The survey instrument was not validated for this specific purpose, which could affect the reliability of the findings. The study did not include qualitative interviews or focus groups, which might have provided deeper insights into the staff's experiences.
Declared interests
The study was funded by Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Canada Research Chair Program, Canada Brain Research Fund, Heart and Stroke Foundation Canadian Partnership for Stroke Recovery, and Michael Smith Health Research BC Fellowship. The funders played no role in the design, conduct, or reporting of the study.
The easy way to misread this
Do not assume that wearable devices accurately measure step counts or heart rate for all stroke patients, especially those with slower or atypical gaits. Staff concerns about accuracy were significant, and only about half planned to continue using these devices in practice.
Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →